We are a leading third party technical support company, delivering HP Laptop Support services for HP laptop users in very nominal charges. Your HP laptop has some technical issues, so it is not working properly. When your HP laptop is not working properly, it means that your HP laptop is passing through some technical attacks. So there's no way to extend the behavior of the core DOM prototypes. In IE, the elements of the core DOM are not actually derived from the standard Object prototype, and their prototypes are not even visible.
![tomtom mydrive connect showing maps expired tomtom mydrive connect showing maps expired](https://download.tomtom.com/support/cc/help/assets/images/mydrive/01-130515-LOGIN_small.png)
IE has "alien" types: All right, this isn't Javascript's fault. Lord help you if you accidentally overwrite an existing method. That one took some head-scratching the first time I encountered it.Įxtension by mutation: It seems an industry standard form of "extension" is to mutate the prototype of an object. Specifically, if you use this to try to use this form on an array, you end up iterating over all the names of the member variables of the array object (which includes the elements of the array, because they are also member variables, whose names are integers! wow). It has nothing to do with iterating over collections.
![tomtom mydrive connect showing maps expired tomtom mydrive connect showing maps expired](https://i.pinimg.com/originals/a8/38/d0/a838d05423a9b07866c5eb35771ba2e3.png)
But it's not at all what you'd expect! This special form is only used to range over the keys (i.e., member names) in an object. in: In addition to the ordinary integer-indexed for loops, Javascript has a for. But that "class name" is in fact just an ordinary Javascript function.įor. By convention, people usually capitalize the name of constructor functions, which makes it look like Java-style, class-based object creation. Rather than being defined in classes, constructors in Javascript are simply functions that, when called with the new operator, have their new object implicitly available via this. (It can also be used to simulate class-based inheritance.) The prototype of an object is exposed via its prototype member variable, which is mutable like everything else in Javascript. This is quite different from class-based inheritance, but it does provide a kind of dynamic dispatch, so it serves similar purposes. But every object is also linked to a "prototype" object, and name resolution searches the chain of prototype references. To start with, objects are essentially just associative arrays, i.e., tables mapping names to values, much like Python or Lua. Object system: Javascript is the only prototype-based OO language I've ever worked with, so this was all new to me.
![tomtom mydrive connect showing maps expired tomtom mydrive connect showing maps expired](https://i.pinimg.com/originals/7f/23/51/7f235153d51331323ada0989efa719ae.jpg)
It's truly strange, but it has a sort of internal consistency, and you kind of have to admire their chutzpah. It gets even weirder: this means that global function declarations of the formįunction foo() which is a declaration of a global variable, i.e., a member variable of the global object, whose value is a function. Furthermore, all global variables are actually member variables of this global object. In DHTML engines it's some kind of window object or something, whereas in Rhino it might be something else (this is hearsay-I haven't tried it).
#Tomtom mydrive connect showing maps expired free#
The upshot is that you can create an ordinary function that refers to this in its body, and then later assign that function as a member of an object, and the this automatically gets wired to the new container.īizarrely, there is a special "global" object, so that if such a function is not a member of any object, this refers to that special object even more bizarre is that particular Javascript engines seem to be free to make that global object whatever they want. This is everywhere: There is always a special this variable available, but its binding is dynamically scoped. Somewhat unfortunately, if it doesn't find any member of the given name, it silently generates a new global variable of that name and performs the assignment. Basically, if you assign to a variable that hasn't been declared lexically with var, the language first searches the dynamically scoped this object for a member of that name, and then up the prototype chain. }the variable x is always shadowed in the body of g, so that it displays either 3 or undefined, and never 2.įurthermore, you can assign to variables that have not been declared with var, which is subtly necessary because of the dynamic scope of this (see below). This means that in the following example: }I think the meaning of this function is that the lexical scope of x is lifted to the entire function body, but if the if-branch isn't taken, x has the default undefined value. This means that you can write strange-looking functions like However, despite the C-like syntax, there is no block-style scoping.
![tomtom mydrive connect showing maps expired tomtom mydrive connect showing maps expired](https://hacktheplanetbook.com/images/mytomtom-produktbild-54e8c0922411d.png)
Lexical scope: Functions are first-class values, and variables declared within the var keyword are sort of lexically scoped with respect to the nesting of functions. Javascript is not a wholly unpleasant language to work in, but it has its share of surprises.